The picture of Dorian Gray
11v2
Namhyung Kwon
When
I first bumped into this novel, I was 14, starting to get inspired and astonished
by moral and legal acts, human nature and the devil living in one’s mind.
Schools and parents kept telling what’s moral and some acts that we should not
do. I, reluctantly, pretend to admit their words, but I always wanted to know
the reason or criterion of deciding what’s moral and what’s immoral. <The
Picture of Dorian Gray> somewhat strongly affected my inner mind at that
time, even though I did not fully understand the whole philosophy of author,
Oscar Wilde.
The
novel starts with descriptions of the studio of Basil Hallward, a famous
painter. He and his friend, Lord Henry Wotton, were lying back on the corner of
the divan of Persian saddle-bags smoking and having a chat about a drawing that
Basil drew. Lord Henry thinks that it was his friend’s masterpiece and he keeps
convincing his friend to send it to Grosvenor. Basil refuses the proposal, telling
the story of Dorian Gray. He freaked out when his friend asked him to introduce
Mr. Dorian Gray. He thought that his friend’s twisted and cynical
characteristic would corrupt Mr. Dorian Gray’s pure simple and beautiful
nature.
“Simple
and beautiful nature!” As I read down the novel I thought, ‘How can a person have
simple and beautiful nature?’ or ‘What is simple and beautiful nature?’ I’ve
never met a person having simple and beautiful nature at the same time. If a
person has simple nature, he or she somehow disturbs others. If a person has
beautiful or moral characteristic, it is never simple but always complex and
complicated. Maybe the term “beautiful” does not mean being moral. Moral may be
helpful to others but some critics do not think moral things as beautiful
stuffs. In some novels and books, pure is both beautiful and simple. They claim
that even pure evil is simple and beautiful. However, now I know that pure is
not necessary beautiful and pure is not the standard of deciding its value.
I’ve
made a conclusion myself, as “having simple and beautiful nature is being perfect
at every aspect that human can have and having highest value.” Having highest
value at every feature can be considered as beautiful, since, perfectness is the
ideal worth of human nature, and having highest value brings clear ends of controversy
topic of being simple. My conclusion defines “Simple and Beautiful Nature” as
perfect ideal characteristic of human being. It is not something about pure or
clean, it is thing about being perfect by its existence.
Unique approach to discussing the opening pages. I first read the book in university, so I'm a bit surprised you would read it at age 14. It would definitely be considered "heavy" reading, and a lot of it would potentially seem boring. However, the tone clearly suggests that morality and traditional notions of beauty and morality will be questioned. You do a decent job of digging into that, but I must admit I'm not entirely clear on what your conclusion is.
답글삭제Dorian, himself, is a bit of a vapid individual (at least at first), and it appears Henry indeed sets his debauchery in motion. He's a bit of a tabula rasa.
Try to focus just a bit more on the book.